What is richardwebster.net?

IT HAS OFTEN SEEMED to me that anthropology, like charity, ought to begin at home a great deal more frequently than it does. For although anthropologists have produced hundreds of books about exotic, or non-western cultures and the meaning of their customs and cosmologies, the world-view of our own culture remains in many respects mysterious.

There is a saying which might be applied to this predicament. ‘We do not know much about who discovered the ocean’, it runs, ‘but we can be pretty sure it wasn’t a fish’. These words remind us that any habitual environment tends to escape both attention and analysis. What familiarity ultimately breeds is not so much contempt as invisibility.

The saying is, I believe, a profound one. Nowhere more so than when it is applied to the perspective we have on our own history. For one of the most interesting features of the western rationalist culture which we now inhabit is that very few of those who are given to celebrating reason and science most unreservedly would be able to give a reasoned account of the origins of modern secular rationalism We believe in reason, it sometimes seems, with a fervour which is itself profoundly irrational.

This website is an attempt to explore such fervour and to inquire into what the basis of our faith in reason, science and modern secular liberalism, actually is. It is also, as can be seen from the list on the left, an anthology of some of my own reviews, essays and articles. Since, with very few exceptions, these deal with aspects of the same problem, they are not in fact the disparate assortment they might appear to be.

For at the heart of almost everything I have written over the last twenty years or so is the view that, in our modern, proudly rationalist attempts to break the links which tie us to our superstitious, essentially religious past, we have become profoundly muddled about our own cultural history. The muddle we have managed to get ourselves into does not only have intellectual consequences, it is also potentially (and, indeed, actually) dangerous.

The essays and reviews which are collected here are an attempt to examine some of those intellectual consequences and to point to some of the dangers.

Those who wish to explore further the point of view which I have briefly outlined here may do so by reading the introduction, The legacy of Freud, whose original function was to introduce my book about psychoanalysis. Alternatively they may pursue a parallel course by using the sampler or by reading practically any one of the essays, reviews and extracts which are indexed on the left-hand side of this page.

It might well be thought that the section of the index which is headed ‘false allegations’ and which lists a number of articles dealing with a contemporary witch-hunt, stands outside the view of cultural history I have advanced in other sections. In fact, however, this is not the case. The most fervent modern advocates of reason and of science have often suggested or implied that we are no longer generally susceptible to dangerous delusions such as gripped the minds of learned men in the great European witch-hunt of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. This is, I believe, but another example of the dangers of rationalism. For if we accept and allow ourselves to be guided by a view of cultural history which denies the very possibility of a witch-hunt taking place in our midst, we have created the ideal conditions for one to take place in front of our eyes without our even noticing what is happening.

My own investigation into police ‘trawling operations’, which has now occupied me for a number of years, is not, in one sense at least, a diversion from the theory of cultural history which is worked out in other parts of this website. It is an attempt to apply that theory in practice.

On a general note I should point out that, although most of the pieces which are collected here have been published previously, a significant number, including some of the more substantial essays, appear for the first time. In a number of cases, book reviews and articles appear here in a fuller version than when they were first published, as I have taken the opportunity to restore passages which were excised for reasons of space.

Some of these reviews and articles first appeared in the Guardian, the Observer, the Times Literary Supplement or the New Statesman. Other reviews were originally published in The Tablet. Since The Tablet is a Catholic periodical, some readers may conclude, as the authors of a biography of Darwin which I reviewed critically there once did, that I am a Catholic. The correct conclusion would be that The Tablet is a broad-minded publication which does not concern itself unduly with its contributors’ religious faith – or lack of it. In fact I was asked to write reviews for The Tablet only after I had been identified in its pages as an atheist. It is from this perspective and no other that I seek to understand religious beliefs and their cultural significance.

Oxford, June 2002; revised 2006                       Printable version

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

© Richard Webster, 2002/6

www.richardwebster.net

THE COLLECTION OF LINKS in the left-hand column of this page are all to outside sites . Most, though not all of the featured links below are to essays or articles on this site.